Papers with claim extraction
Claim Extraction and Law Matching for COVID-19-related Legislation (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to extract legal claims from news articles and match them with applicable laws are difficult for laypersons to learn since news articles do not refer to underlying laws. |
| Approach: | They propose an automated approach to extract legal claims from news articles and match the claims with applicable laws. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 46.7 F1 for claim extraction and 91.4 F1 law matching, despite conceptual limitations. |
JointCQ: Improving Factual Hallucination Detection with Joint Claim and Query Generation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for detecting factual hallucinations in generated content exhibit limitations in the first two stages of the halluciation detection pipeline. |
| Approach: | They propose a joint claim-and-query generation framework that can detect factual hallucinations in generated content. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on open-domain QA hallucination detection benchmarks. |
IAM: A Comprehensive and Large-Scale Dataset for Integrated Argument Mining Tasks (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining (AM) is a computational process that is used to analyze information in a debating system. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large dataset to automate the manual process of debating . they propose to integrate claim extraction, stance classification and evidence extraction tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed tasks can extract claims, stances, evidence and more from a large dataset . the proposed tasks are highly efficient and can be applied to argument mining tasks . |
Towards Effective Extraction and Evaluation of Factual Claims (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Lack of a standardized evaluation framework impedes assessment and comparison of claim extraction methods. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating claim extraction in the context of fact-checking . they also introduce Claimify, an LLM-based claim extraction method . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework outperforms existing methods in the evaluation of claim extraction methods. |
NSF-SciFy: Mining the NSF Awards Database for Scientific Claims (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | NSF-SciFy contains 2.8 million claims from 400,000 abstracts spanning all science and mathematics disciplines. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset to extract scientific claims from National Science Foundation award abstracts and to use it to refine language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves non-technical abstract generation, claim extraction, and investigation proposal extraction tasks while maintaining high precision and lower recall. |